Authorized Heritage Discourse, destination Sweden!

This is the link to the article referenced to in this post!

We all want to travel, but a lot of the time it is not realistic or feasible for us to. For this blog post I will take us on a small journey to a region of Sweden in order to evaluate authorized heritage discourse. Thanks to Anders Högberg, the author of, “The Voice of the Authorized Heritage Discourse:  A critical analysis of signs at ancient monuments in Skåne, Southern Sweden” we are able to get some further insight on the very daunting topic of authorized heritage discourse. What is labeled as heritage discourse is like all things subject to a multitude of interpretations, some of which may be the “proper” discourse for a world heritage site as claimed by so called professionals, or it is possible to receive an adequate universal description of a site in mind.

It is obvious that the people of the world are bound to exhibit differences amongst each other; in fact even the denizens of the United States differ from state to state in some way. With this logic in mind, it is almost bound to be the same in Europe, and specifically in regards to our location of current interest Sweden. In his article, Högberg expresses the problem of heritage sites being solely described by simple signs. He carefully mentions that by no means are signs the only way that these sites are being described or presented but he clearly states that signs are the most dominant form. In fact he goes on to mention that these signs are not even doing their job to begin with,

“Studies have shown, however, that when ancient monuments and sites today are made accessible and provided with signs, it is usually done through an official language and an attitude to information and what the information holds that has not changed noticeably in the last few decades.”

Högberg exclaims, “This is often the only information that meets a visitor to the place.” This shows that if more than face value is to be received from these sites or if full meaning is to be portrayed for all to observe, then changes must be made. Following the Nara conference of 1994, it was implemented into the arena of world heritage that perspective and subjective interpretations become essential in determining authenticity. Yet, this dilemma is still apparent in this region of Sweden and perhaps other areas of the world may be facing the same conflict.

What is most important about this article is the fact that one criterion for a world heritage site is that it has to possess some kind of “outstanding universal value.” However, this is almost impossible if the world heritage sites and their appropriate descriptions are controlled by a specific discourse or attitude based on their location. It is almost imperative to understanding world heritage that there are two the perspectives, “the informer and the informed.” Both of which are directly relayed by the method of informing, and in this case this is the infamous signs. Sites across the globe have had their meanings altered based on their location, as seen with the internal conflict of the Hannibal, Missouri site. Yet, what is important to remember is that there are certain forces that control aspects of our lives. Högberg puts it as such, “what is institutionally pointed out and what is indi­vidually experienced.” Even after all the media and our access to it, we still face the problem that the past has always faced in regards to these sites, interpretation. To understand is to know, and we cannot know what is not always directly apparent.

Take a look at these pictures that Högberg has provided in his article:

These are only a few sites in a grouping of many that are simply defined by these signs.





This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Authorized Heritage Discourse, destination Sweden!

  1. rramirez46 says:

    Your post was very informative and was able to explain authorized heritage discourse in relation to Sweden. Providing photos from the article was a great idea because it allows people to get visuals to go along with your blog post.

  2. nlenriquez says:

    I was able to understand what authorized heritage discourse was through the relation you made with Sweden. You provided enough information and somewhat cited your work so it was easy for others to learn more.

  3. mbrooks8 says:

    This is a detailed post that included a bit of social aspects and acknowledges the differences between people. It is also nice that you also wrote about the perspectives of the “informer and the informed”, further proving your point.

  4. dchouu says:

    This blog was very intriguing. I was able to take a lot of information from reading it and i really appreciate all the descriptive pictures because it gave me a better and clearer idea of what you were discussing. Great work!

  5. sbolanos3 says:

    Sweden has always been on my list on places to visit. Now that I have bit more of background information I am more determined to go. Knowing how Sweden incorporated into your heritage was interesting.

  6. anunez35 says:

    I really like how much information you distributed to the reader, and still made it very interesting. The Photographs helped me visualize it more. The part I found to be the most interesting is when you stated “What is most important about this article is the fact that one criterion for a world heritage site is that it has to possess some kind of “outstanding universal value.” However, this is almost impossible if the world heritage sites and their appropriate descriptions are controlled by a specific discourse or attitude based on their location. “

  7. Wow, you post was very informative. I didn’t really know anything about Sweden to be honest. I actually got some insight on it because of your blog. Thanks for providing such descriptive details!

  8. mgoldberg4 says:

    I appreciate the feedback from all of you guys, it can often be difficult talking about a country you know nothing about. However, I tried my best using my understanding of the topic to formulate this blog post and I am simply thrilled you enjoyed it!

  9. rstadnitskiy says:

    I found your post to be informative and interesting at the same time! Sweden has always been a country of great interest to me, and I thought you presented your points effectively.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s